1. some of the major alleged members are unaware of their membership;
2. other members are unaware that the coalition is a military coalition.
Some key members of the 34-nation anti-Islamic State coalition announced by Saudi Arabia have a fundamental question: just what is it?
Indonesia did not know it was going to be a military alliance, which it does not want to join. A senior Pakistani lawmaker only learned the news from a Reuters reporter.
...Comments from several of the countries that signed up to the initiative appeared to reveal a lack of preparation by Riyadh, which approached partners with an invitation to join a coordination centre but then announced a military alliance.
...Armanatha Nasir, Foreign Ministry spokesman for Indonesia, said the Saudi foreign minister had approached Jakarta twice in the past few days to ask it to join a "centre to coordinate against extremism and terrorism".
However, "what Saudi Arabia has announced is a military alliance, ... It is thus important for Indonesia to first have details before deciding to support it," he said. Jakarta had not yet decided whether to join the group.
[source : Confusion clouds Saudi Arabia's anti-IS coalition, Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-security-idUSKBN0TZ1H520151216, 16th December 2015]
This is astonishing considering that we, this Disunited Fascist Queendom, are 'considering' putting boots on the ground in Syria to support this 'coalition'.
Britain could send a “very substantial” number of non-combat troops to Syria to support fighters attempting to halt the advance of Isis, the Foreign Secretary has said.
Philip Hammond signalled that the UK was ready to support a new Saudi-led Islamic military coalition which has been set up to combat the jihadist forces controlling wide areas of Syria and Iraq.
[source : Britain could send 'substantial' number of non-combat troops to support war on Isis in Syria, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/britain-could-send-substantial-number-of-non-combat-troops-to-support-war-on-isis-in-syria-a6776121.html, 16th December 2015]
Be ye fooled not: the decision has already been taken. This will basically be a Saudi invasion of Syria supported by the United Kingdom.
There is nothing anti-terror about what is going to happen. The UK and Saudi Arabia have been forced into this action by Russia's intervention in Syria, which was at the request of Assad, who is under siege from a plague of international cutthroat Jihadis who have been financed and supported by...Saudi Arabia!!
This was revealed by Seymour Hersh in the 5th March 2007 edition of New Yorker Magazine in an article entitled The Redirection in which Hersh reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the worst Sunni terrorists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. I trongly believe that this decision was taken because the initial plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark was by 2007 moribund.
And once Syria has been destroyed Iran will be next.
Iraq, Iran and Syria were not invited to join the 'alliance', despite Iraq and Syria fighting Daesh for years!!
Role of Saudi-led ‘military alliance’ put to question as some members reject participation
https://t.co/pE2gGOgmlj pic.twitter.com/mu0SlsuCX4
— RT (@RT_com) December 17, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment