Thursday, January 21, 2016

THIS PARTICULAR PICTURE PAINTS A THOUSAND WORDS

For nearly 7 years the British government refused to hold an inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko, instead saying that they had the proof that Russia did it but we can't see it.

But then in 2013 the British government suddenly changed its mind, just as Russia began to get involved in Syria.

Much of the 'evidence' presented to the inquiry was presented in secret.

Today the judge leading the inquiry has published his findings, and surprise...he has found that Russia "probably" ordered the assassination of Litvinenko, and that Putin "probably" had some involvement too.

But here is a picture that paints a thousand words:


This is one of the alleged murderers, Andrei Lugovoi, with his family just a few hours after he allegedly murdered Litvinenko with Polonium 210. I ask: if you had administered Polonium 210 to kill someone who was your friend/business partner, would you, covered in this dangerous radioactive substance, go to a football match with your family, thus risking the life of your family?

Lugovoi was asked to become an agent for MI6, but he refused. These allegations against him led to the loss of a multi-million dollar contract.

And the vast majority of Polonium 210 is bought by one nation: the USA.

And then there are the two counsels to the inquiry: Robin Tam was counsel for MI5 and the FCO during the belated inquiry into the death of Diana; and Ben Emmerson is counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, and has been criticised by victims.

But if Russia did murder Litvinenko, then why would they?

Litvinenko was a traitor. He worked for another traitor, Boris Berezovsky, and also for MI6 writing anti-Putin propaganda, accusing Putin of being behind 9/11 and all the Islamic terrorism, and calling Putin a peadophile among other things.

But we do have to ask, why did the British government refuse to hold an inquiry into Litvinenko for 7 years, keeping its alleged 'evidence' secret, only deciding to hold an inquiry when Russia began to get involved in Syria? And then when the inquiry gets going, why is much of the evidence is presented in secret?

And why only now, when Russia is annihilating the international cutthroat Jihadis who were unleashed onto Syria by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states, is it alleged that Putin "probably" murdered Litvinenko?



No comments: