ISLAMIC STATE'S CLAIMS OF RESPONSIBILITY SHOW IT IS A PUPPET OF NATO

Islamic State have released a video claiming responsibility for the crash of Metrojet 9268.

The Isis militant group has released a new video celebrating the crash of a Russian plane over the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt, and reaffirming its claim of responsibility.

The seven-minute video was released by the media wing of Isis’s Aleppo “province”, and praised the “lion fighters” of the militant group’s branch in Sinai for “bringing down a Russian airplane”.

The video does not include any details of how the plane might have been brought down, but expressly describes the apparent terror attack as retaliation for Russian air strikes in Syria.

[source : New Isis video celebrates Russian plane crash and praises Sinai branch for 'bringing down the jet', The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/new-isis-video-celebrates-russian-plane-crash-and-praises-sinai-branch-for-bringing-down-the-jet-a6726046.html, 8th November 2015]

Note the reason: "retaliation for Russian air strikes in Syria".

But according to NATO's intelligence department, Bellingcat, Russia has hardly been bombing Islamic State!

So if Bellingcat are telling the troof then why would Islamic State apparently retaliate in this way if Russia had hardly bombed them? Particularly when NATO has been allegedly bombing them for over a year?

And what does this say about NATO's claimed success in their bombing of Islamic State for over a year...without any retaliation from Islamic State...despite MI5 terrifying us with claims that Islamic State (and Jeremy Corbyn) are hiding under our beds waiting to slit our throats when we nod off?

So:
1. according to Bellingcat, Russia has barely attacked Islamic State and has been lying about their attacks on Islamic State;
2. yet Islamic State have apparently retaliated by blowing up a Russian civilian passenger aircraft;
3. despite the USA, UK, etc claiming to have bombed Islamic State for over a year when Russia has bombed Islamic State for just over one month.

What the fuck is going on?

My thinking is that if it was a bomb then Islamic State did not plant it, but it was instead planted by an intelligence agency, probably Saudi and with the full complicity of the UK.

Egypt has always been British.