Prince Charles seems to have been in the media a lot this last week, a lot more than usual.
Are we being prepared for a transition?
Anyway, Charles has told Muslims in Britain to respect our laws. Fair enough, you might think. Yeah, they should respect our laws. Everyone, including the Royal Family themselves, should respect the laws, of the state, even if that state is a state of the USA...
But let's turn that statement back on him. Should he respect the laws of other nations? Nations like, er, shall we say...SYRIA?
In 2013 the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas admitted to French Parliamentary Channel LCP that he was asked by British security services in 2009 to help them to plan and organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria.
That was in 2009.
Two years earlier in 2007 Seymour Hersh had reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that such Jihadis would be unleashed onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. Charles has been filmed doing a little dance, making a little love and getting down with the Saudis as they pranced around with swords, looking rather menacing. The Saudis were made by Great Britain, and take their orders from Liz, soon Charles.
And I propose that this 2007 agreement was reached because by 2007 the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark, was moribund, with only 2 wars (Iraq and Lebanon) and 1 regime change (Iraq). The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. The first four were named in a Zionist warmongering document entitled A Clean Break, Libya was a known enemy of Israel. Sudan and Somalia are the unknowns (to me at least), but I suspect oil off the coast of Somalia is a possible reason.
Charles has also visited the Zaatari refugee camp and called it a 'nightmare'. A nightmare that he and his Saudi mates created?
Charles has also expressed his concern at young British Muslims seeking adventure in joining Jihad in Iraq and Syria. But for decades now Great Britain has had a Covenant of Security with the Jihadis that as long as they serve British foreign policy then they could operate out of and recruit in Great Britain. This led to London being called Londonistan. Osama bin Laden had a mansion in Wembley. And it is current British foreign policy that President Assad of Syria be ousted to make way for a pipeline from the Pars field starting in Qatar so that Dave's new mates, the Qatar Royal family, can buy up London and reduce Russia's influence in Europe.
The British Security Services and Saudi Arabia take their orders from Liz not Parliament. Just this week GCHQ's policy of mass surveillance was deemed unlawful.
It's all a farce: money, war, the war on terror. Everything.
We create our own monsters to go to war to slay but also cite them as a reason for the police state.
No comments:
Post a Comment