HAMAS AND THE IHH

Now Hamas are playing silly buggers, saying they won't accept the aid off the flotilla until all those detained off the boats are released.

But today we begin to hear more about IHH who sponsored the flotilla.

Some but not all of the UK media are stating that IHH are linked to terrorism. They do not mention that Israeli terrorists plotted to blow up our Parliament and blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, but I'll go on.

The media cite a study by Evan Kohlman entitled "The Role Of Islamic Charities In International Terrorist Recruitment And Financing" written for the Danish Institute for International Studies. Kohlman works for The Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation, or NEFA. NEFA's role is to examine the role of Islamic terrorists in 9/11, and to stay way clear of any role that Rumsfeld or Cheney may have played.

But NEFA's other employees are of interest. They include MT Hayes, David Draper and Douglas Farrah. Before establishing NEFA Hayes, Draper and Farrah worked for Rosetta Research, which was involved in a controversial sting of an opium farmer in Afghanistan called Haji Bashir Noorzai. Noorzai was lured to New York thinking he was helping the US government by providing information. He was instead arrested for drug smuggling.

Rosetta was allegedly created to help the families of 9/11 victims to track the flow of terrorist money, but it also had the intention of creating a database of alleged terrorist finance information that could be sold to banks and other interested parties..for a nice profit. After Rosetta went bankrupt Hayes, Draper and Farrah received substantial payments to join NEFA.

Kohlman also produced a film for The Pentagon called The Al-Qaida Plan that was shown by the prosecution, i.e. US government, at a trial of a detainee, ObL's driver, at Guantanamo Bay. That film was admittedly based on a similar propaganda film called The Nazi Plan that was used to convict Germans at Nuremberg. As we know now, the Nazis were set up by Wall Street and the City of London for WW2 and to prosecute the holocaust to convince European Jews that that they needed a Jewish homeland. American bankers and industrialists who collaborated with the Nazis were given a Get Out of Jail Free card. The Germans were tried, found guilty and executed.

So what we are seeing here is possibly the ugly head of a US intelligence iceberg. Blogs and foundations and companies set up to gather and profit from terrorist finance information and to disseminate propaganda by projecting the Islamic-terrorists-did-9/11-on-their-own and not addressing the plain and simple fact that 9/11 satisfied the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC and the Zionazis wanted to convince the US public to go to war in the Middle East inline with the theses laid out in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

But it does look like there was possibly more to this flotilla. And possibly is the key word.

I find it interesting that no weapons have been found, on any of the passengers, dead or alive, or in the cargo. Kitchen knives and pipes are nothing to armed kevlar-protected Israeli commandoes boarding a ship in international waters in the haze of gas grenades at 4am.

So perhaps it was an aid flotilla after all. An aid flotilla carrying aid to people made destitute due to Israel's belligerence and hatred.

But is it also possible and/or probable that if Israel knew the IHH was sponsoring this flotilla that it suspected that if its commandoes boarded the flotilla, particularly after lobbing gas grenades etc at 4am, that if suspected 'activists' were on board that they might get some bother and aggro? I'm also thinking that one report today states that three of the four Turks who were shot had dreamed of martyrdom. Were they on the hit list that was found a day or two ago?

Despite the alleged terrorist links of the IHH I still fully support the aims of the flotilla, to carry aid to the crushed people of Gaza, crushed by the US-financed Israeli military.

I also demand that the illegal and inhumane blockade of Gaza cease immediately. It is in the best interests of Gaza, Israel and the whole world.

As Craig Murray questioned today; what is the exact legal status of the relationship between Gaza and Israel?

Every comments thread on every internet site on the world which has discussed the Israeli naval murders, has been inundated by organised ZIonist commenters stating that the Israeli action was legal under the San Remo Manual of International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea.

They ignore those parts of San Remo that specifically state that it is illegal to enforce a general blockade on an entire population. But even apart from that, San Remo simply does not apply.

The manual relates specifically to legal practice in time of war. With whom is Israel at war?

There is no war.

Israeli apologists have gone on to say they are in a state of armed conflict with Gaza.

Really? In that case, why do we continually hear Israeli complaints about rockets fired from Gaza into Israel? If it is the formal Israeli position that it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then Gaza has every right to attack Israel with rockets.

But in fact, plainly to the whole world, the nature and frequency of Israeli complaints about rocket attacks gives evidence that Israel does not in fact believe that a situation of armed conflict exists.

Secondly, if Israel wishes to claim it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then it must treat all of its Gazan prisoners as prisoners of war entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention. If you are in a formal state of armed conflict, you cannot categorise your opponents as terrorists.

But again, it is plain for the world to see from its treatment and description of Gazan prisoners that it does not consider itself to be in a formal position of armed conflict.

As Albert Pike proposed this Israel-Palestinian conflict is designed to grind us all down and suck us all in, until one day we wake up and say to each other, "fuck it, let's have a great big war to settle this once and for all", and when we've killed each other and only a fraction survive the bankers will overtly form their world government and nobody will have enough strength or desire to resist it.